2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 994 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Mustang | Elite |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 29 L |