2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 738 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (410 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | Herald |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 83 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 29 L |