2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1965 Lotus 33
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus 33 (212 HP @ 10800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus 33 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 842 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1965 Lotus 33 | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Mustang | 33 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 10800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 456 kg |