2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Mustang | Fronte |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 32 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 66 L |