2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1965 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1965 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 263 kg more than 1965 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Toyota Crown. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1965 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Crown |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 411 Nm | 146 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 75 L |