2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1966 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Mustang | Seven |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3801 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 29 L |