2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 MG MGC
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1966 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 MG MGC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG MGC. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1966 MG MGC | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Mustang | MGC |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2560 mm |