2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 2 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Mustang | 240 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 54 L |
