2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1967 Triumph TR5
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph TR5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph TR5 would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1967 Triumph TR5. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph TR5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (544 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph TR5. (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph TR5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1967 Triumph TR5 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | TR5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 544 Nm | 222 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |