2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1967 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 443 kg more than 1967 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1967 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Mustang | 850 K |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |