2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1968 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 464 kg more than 1968 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1968 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Mustang | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |