2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1968 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 TVR Tuscan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 TVR Tuscan would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 TVR Tuscan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1968 TVR Tuscan. (229 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1968 TVR Tuscan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 797 kg more than 1968 TVR Tuscan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1968 TVR Tuscan | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | Mustang | Tuscan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 65 L |