2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 838 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M670.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Mustang | M670 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2570 mm |
