2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Renault 8
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 8 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1972 Renault 8. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 882 kg more than 1972 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1972 Renault 8 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 38 L |