2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1974 Seat 133
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Seat 133 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1974 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1974 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 884 kg more than 1974 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Seat 133. (54 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1974 Seat 133 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 133 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 841 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 54 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2030 mm |