2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Kia Brisa
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1976 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 872 kg more than 1976 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 461 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Kia Brisa. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Kia Brisa.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1976 Kia Brisa | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Mustang | Brisa |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 68 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2270 mm |