2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 642 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1976 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | 929 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1074 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |
