2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Mazda RX-4

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 410 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-4.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 1976 Mazda RX-4
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mustang RX-4
Year Released 2004 1976
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4009 cc 2616 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 211 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1520 kg 1110 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4400 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2520 mm