2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 299 kg more than 1976 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1976 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Mark II |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 170 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2590 mm |