2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1977 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 682 kg more than 1977 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1977 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Mustang | Colt |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3801 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2310 mm |
