2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1977 Rover 3500
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rover 3500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rover 3500 would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1977 Rover 3500. (157 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1977 Rover 3500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 122 kg more than 1977 Rover 3500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1977 Rover 3500 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Mustang | 3500 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3802 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1372 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2820 mm |
