2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1977 Simca 1309
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Simca 1309. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Simca 1309 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1977 Simca 1309. (87 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1977 Simca 1309. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 423 kg more than 1977 Simca 1309. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Simca 1309, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (410 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Simca 1309. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Simca 1309.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1977 Simca 1309 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Mustang | 1309 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 134 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 58 L |