2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1977 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1977 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 325 kg more than 1977 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1977 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Mark II |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2590 mm |