2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1977 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 702 kg more than 1977 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 436 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1977 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Mustang | 1300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2430 mm |