2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1977 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 676 kg more than 1977 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1977 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Mustang | 1500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 113 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2430 mm |