2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Simca 1100
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 353 more horse power than 1979 Simca 1100. (82 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1979 Simca 1100.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Simca 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (544 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Simca 1100. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Simca 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1979 Simca 1100 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Mustang | 1100 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 544 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |