2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 700 kg more than 1979 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | 66 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
