2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 807 kg more than 1979 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1979 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Mustang | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2010 mm |
