2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 376 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (544 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 451 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Mustang | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 544 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
