2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1981 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 340 kg more than 1981 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 2562 cc |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2640 mm |