2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 339 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (544 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (127 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 240 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 544 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |