2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Zastava 132
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 621 kg more than 1981 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1981 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Mustang | 132 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2560 mm |
