2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 558 kg more than 1981 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1981 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Mustang | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2430 mm |
