2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Century would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (300 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1982 Buick Century. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Century.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Buick Century. (197 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1982 Buick Century | |
Make | Ford | Buick |
Model | Mustang | Century |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 434 Nm | 197 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2664 mm |