2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Innocenti Mini

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Innocenti Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Innocenti Mini would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1982 Innocenti Mini. (48 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Innocenti Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 774 kg more than 1982 Innocenti Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Innocenti Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Innocenti Mini. (69 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Innocenti Mini.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 1982 Innocenti Mini
Make Ford Innocenti
Model Mustang Mini
Year Released 2004 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3802 cc 998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 190 HP 48 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 69 Nm
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 64.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 76.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1494 kg 720 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 3170 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2050 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 38 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]