2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Kia Brisa
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1982 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 728 kg more than 1982 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (410 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Kia Brisa. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Kia Brisa.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1982 Kia Brisa | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Mustang | Brisa |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 68 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2270 mm |