2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Lancia Delta
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Delta. (75 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 363 kg more than 1982 Lancia Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Delta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Delta. (105 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Delta.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1982 Lancia Delta | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Mustang | Delta |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 105 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 55.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 51 L |