2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Lancia Trevi

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Trevi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Trevi would be higher. At 3,931 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Trevi. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Trevi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 242 kg more than 1982 Lancia Trevi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Trevi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Trevi. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Trevi.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 1982 Lancia Trevi
Make Ford Lancia
Model Mustang Trevi
Year Released 2004 1982
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3931 cc 1585 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 134 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100.4 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 71.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1387 kg 1145 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4330 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 52 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]