2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 650 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Lancer |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2390 mm |