2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Peugeot 305
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Peugeot 305. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Peugeot 305 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 326 more horse power than 1982 Peugeot 305. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Peugeot 305. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 796 kg more than 1982 Peugeot 305. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Peugeot 305. (96 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Peugeot 305.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1982 Peugeot 305 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Mustang | 305 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1288 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 67.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |
