2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 693 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (410 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1982 Skoda L | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Mustang | L |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 74 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 68.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 38 L |