2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 397 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Alto.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (544 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 485 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1982 Suzuki Alto | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Mustang | Alto |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 544 Nm | 59 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1410 mm |
