2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,931 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 672 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 1982 Volkswagen Polo
Make Ford Volkswagen
Model Mustang Polo
Year Released 2004 1982
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3931 cc 1043 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 39 HP
Torque 310 Nm 74 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100.4 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 59 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1387 kg 715 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2340 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]