2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1983 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1983 Renault Rodeo. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 798 kg more than 1983 Renault Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault Rodeo. (75 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1983 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 75 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 34 L |