2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 198 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Mustang | CJ |
Year Released | 2004 | 1985 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |