2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1989 Lotus Carlton
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (411 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1989 Lotus Carlton | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Mustang | Carlton |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3615 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 411 Nm | 569 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2750 mm |