2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Lamborghini Diablo
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Lamborghini Diablo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Lamborghini Diablo would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Lamborghini Diablo (485 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (190 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Lamborghini Diablo weights approximately 106 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Lamborghini Diablo (580 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (298 Nm). This means 1992 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1992 Lamborghini Diablo | |
Make | Ford | Lamborghini |
Model | Mustang | Diablo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 5707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 485 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 580 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 27.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |