2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 513 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (410 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Racoon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 107 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1005 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2770 mm |