2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1993 Ford Focus
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Focus would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1993 Ford Focus. (227 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Focus.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Focus. (305 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1993 Ford Focus | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Focus |
Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1230 mm |