2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1993 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 44 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1993 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Mustang | Continental |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1596 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2780 mm |
